By-Election Called: Is the Green Party of Canada Ready?
It’s official now, four by-elections have been called, with the vote to fall on Monday November 9. The lucky ridings are:
Hochelaga, in Montreal, with the Olympic Stadium on it’s West boundary.
New Westminster – Coquitlam, In Vancouver, where NDP Incumbent Dawn Black quit to run Provincially.
Cumberland – Colchester – Musquodoboit Valley, Right next door to Central Nova.
Montmagny – L’Islet – Kamouraska – Rivière-du-Loup, East of Quebec city, on the South Shore of the St. Lawrence.
It’s no big surprise, but it will have some interesting consequences. First off, Elizabeth May once promised to run in the first available by-election. Well, I doubt very much that will happen now. She has made a major commitment to running in SGI by picking up and moving to the West coast. It appears that $62,000 has been commited to pre-writ spending, and the canvas is already in full swing. The die is pretty well cast, and I’d be surprised if Elizabeth’s next few months were spent anywhere outside SGI, meeting her prospective constituents.
So if Elizabeth May isn’t going to be the Green Party’s focus in these by-elections, what’s the plan? We have seen in the past how important By-elections can be for building up a strong EDA. There are two by-elections that spring to mind. Toronto Centre, where Chris Tindal’s campaign ID’d thousands of new supporters, and Guelph, where Mike Nagy and his team went all out, and posted one of the most competetive finishes ever for the Green Party. Then, of course, there’s London North Centre, where Elizabeth May surprised her sceptics, and pulled off a strong second place finish. Thousands of Green Party supporters were identified in London. It seems clear to me that every by-election is an opportunity to mobilise and target resources. We should always be ready to take advantage of the electoral opportunity to build another strong EDA to go forward with.
By-Elections are utterly predictable. You don’t know exactly where they’ll be, and you’re not exactly sure when they’ll be, but sure as rain, there will be a couple of By-elections every year or so. For the leadership, they will have a few opportunities to speak before the national media. For the National Campaign team, there is an opportunity to ‘test drive’ parts of the national platform, and campaign theme. There is an opportunity to build the infrastructure for the central party to lend direct support to target ridings. For the local Electoral District, there is the growth in membership numbers, and profile of the Green Party of Canada. Local capacity to fight future elections will be dramatically higher after a by-election supported by an active Party apparatus.
I know the Election Readiness Commitee has been pretty pre-occupied lately. Small wonder, it’s always a daunting task to prepare for a General Election, and that was properly their focus in the past several months. I’m sure the search for a riding for Elizabeth May to run in took up a lot of attention, and ‘bandwidth’ at head office too. We can also remember though when the last by-election / general election tangle occurred, it confounded the national Party. They were seriously wrong footed by the general election call. I’m afraid that this has been the case for every election since 2004. There is a persistent problem with election readiness.
I find it hard to credit that out of all 23 staff listed on the website, only Catherine Johannson is tasked to election readiness. The Election commitee is Catherine’s election team, but they are all volunteers, not a permanent staff with resources dedicated to the job. We need to have a much more robust campaign infrastructure, and the mechanisms to effectively direct staff and volunteers to acheive strategic and tactical objectives. I mean things like phone banks, volunteer co-ordinators, and field workers to send to hot spots. Trained and experienced campaign managers to plan and execute deployment of resources. Obviously, they should all be prepared to re-focus quickly, as priorities change.
In the past, a relatively ‘green’ (pun intended), leadership made the assumption that elections were all about the Air War waged on the National stage. I think though that Elizabeth May’s experience should by now have taught her that the local election campaign cannot be won by the air war alone. The way she was constrained to choose between such a small number of viable EDA’s to run in for this election should drive home the need for many more well organised EDA’s, with lots of volunteers, money, and experienced campaigners. It would be natural to conclude the central Party needs to be supporting EDA development, and doing all in it’s power to augment local teams. This isn’t a small thing, as it would require a shift away from the current focus on communications. There are only so many salaries to go around, and putting real resources into election readiness, and EDA support will require re-thinking the current payroll. It’s not enough to have an effective public relations organisation. You have to have people on phones, and pounding the pavement if you want to realise your potential. The central party is in a unique position to put in place the infrastructure to augment local efforts, but it will take administrative skill, and some tough decisions.
cross-posted from Not an Official Green Party Site.
- Matthew Day's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Recent Comments
- Frances Thauberger | 18-May-2012
- Trey Capnerhurst | 18-May-2012
- John Grogan | 16-May-2012
- Rick Mitchell | 13-May-2012
- Anne Marie Benoit | 12-May-2012
- 1 of 2221
- ››





Comments
Team Effort -- Help fellow Greens
I'm not sure what happens in the backroom, but I encourage all Greens to give a hand in by-elections when they come up. They are a team effort, and win or lose, its a good chance to talk to voters and help the Green Party out.
If your French is okay, volunteer to make a few calls into one of the Quebec ridings. If you live in the Lower Mainland of BC (or near one of the other three ridings).. please offer to spend 3-6 hours dropping off flyers for the candidates. Or offer to make a few phone calls.
I'm going to try to recruit a few volunteers from out of riding to help out a fellow Green in BC.
Also, if you can afford to make small donation, please do so to help the ridings.
The local contact contacts and a directed donation form can be made off the ridings page:
New West Coquitlam:
http://www.greenparty.ca/riding/59017
Holchega:
http://www.greenparty.ca/riding/24021
Cumberland
http://www.greenparty.ca/riding/12007
Montmagny:
http://www.greenparty.ca/riding/24058
May is running in which BY ELECTION?
I thought the priority was to elect May?
She should be running in Casey's riding should she not ?
Familiar territory and all those volenteers right next door?
And as New west was out of the question already...???
What..? Carr or some other major Green in the New West riding ...right?
I would think we can do things differently as we are the long shots...No?
Sorry but my thinking is much different than some and with 4 huge targets now on the scene for a big Green victory ..... council should be directing full scope on these...NO???
What if there was no general election until next year?
As there probably wont be one actually.
This is a huge missed opportunity it seems then...a very very silly move.
Good luck..................
The reality is..
John, the reality is that it doesn't matter where Elizabeth May runs, she will not win any by-election unless she is a huge front-runner, which is not the case. The Liberals would rather see a Conservative or NDP to win a riding than a Green. The NDP would rather see a Conservative or a Liberal win, and a Conservative would rather see a Liberal or an NDP win.
This is politics. The only party who really needs a byelection win is the Greens. Unfortunately, our approach means we have to pull the pin from the grenade very early, and all other parties certainly want it to blow up in our face. Why would we subject our leader to this?
The make-up of the house is not significantly changed by one riding. Placing our leader into a riding sounds great when you first hear it, but it will simply guarantee the other parties would, if necessary conspire to ensure her loss. Why would anyone want to increase competition in the next general election? Strategic thinking demands that the other three parties will do anything to prevent the GPC from getting the legitimacy of a seat in parliament. In fact, it's worse for the other parties if our leader gets elected, so all things being equal, they will want May to lose more than anyone else.
Plus, this is only an "if" scenario. If she performs poorly for any reason, the party will receive a non-trivial and unnecessary setback. I can see Canwest spinning any loss, no matter how close, into a tragedy -- well, assuming they're still solvent.
Liberals and Greens need to win
I see the by elections as a means to test run campaign strategy prior to the larger election. 4 by elections is almost a mini election. I think that the Liberals and the Greens would be the Partys with the most to gain. If the Liberals gain seats then it builds momentum for Ignatief while for the Greens it would pretty much guarantee a seat at the televised debates. A win really does nothing for the Reform Party. . .uh sorry the Conservative Party. . . but they will definitely want to win one of the seats anyways. . .win doesn't mean much but a shutout by the Conservatives woud definitely make them nervous. As far as May running in one of them I think first they would need to find out if she is allowed to being the registered candidate in another riding.
Not registered
May is not a registered candidate in SGI because candidates do not register until a writ drops. She is the nominee of the Green Party, meaning the party has indicated that they will nominate her when the writ drops - but not until then. In the meantime, she would be allowed to run in another riding if she so chose. However, that may not be the best strategy, as none of these by-elections are in the handfull of top Green ridings, and running there would take time away from building in SGI, which is a top-tier possible-win riding.
Erich Jacoby-Hawkins, Barrie ON - although I'm on Cabinet (Nat'l Rev. and Ecol. Fiscal Reform), views here are my own and may not reflect official GPC positions. Please visit www.ErichtheGreen.ca
Balderdash !!!
OK...I wish I was running in New West then.... as I know I would make an actual impact instead of just playing safe insignificant and irrelevant.
I know I would decimate the nDP and all the rest in debates!
No !
We should be using this tremendous opportunity...to do otherwise shows us insignificant as I already said!
If you do not think we can win in New West Minster...you better start thinking we will never win any where.
I think it time I start forgetting about what I think and trying something else as I am starting to see it is probably hopeless this way..........................any way
What about just Bill Casey's seat ? With May then?
You think we should just nominate some high school student here?
Some of you sound like we already have seats and may be just in the wrong party !
Cowards ? or just political hobbyists?
No wonder we are irrelevant.
Cheers
Balance and time
Just a couple of comments on this thread.
Matt, your initial question is, of course, rhetorical, since the rest of your post seems intent on saying, "no, we are not ready and noone has taken the time to explain the plan to me, so there probably isn't one". You advocate for more investment on election readiness and also on EDA development. That's an easy thing to say, but what you don't say is, what do you cut? You make reference to all the salaries at GPC, but I am reasonably sure that they are all focussed on the success of the GPC and that none of them are getting rich doing this.
It always fascinates me that many members of GPC interpret "grassroots" to mean that the central office should focus / highlight / fund / discontinue operations / etc. so that resources can be channelled to local EDA's. There is also a perception that one's $10 membership entitles one to be a part of every single decision made. Grassroots means grass roots. We elect or hire people to do the work that we cannot get done effectively through volunteerism. It is the roots of the plant that feed the rest, and while the central office can assist EDA's by not making it onerous to participate, the central office cannot force EDA's to grow, or become more organized or do a better job of membership, message and money. In every other political party in this country, the EDA's funnel money to the central office, not the other way around. We should adopt this goal for ourselves, one EDA at a time.
It is true that all of our EDA's can be improved, but most are very young organizations themselves, run by volunteers, and they need time and patience to grow. Demanding that they become highly efficient overnight is akin to demanding that a child act like an adult.
John: To be honest, I don't normally read your posts, but I found one of your comments particularly galling. When you say "no wonder we are irrelevant", I urge you to remember that you speak for yourself, and not for me or the rest of the party. I am sure that his will generate a long diatriabe from you, but I assure you that I will not be responding to it.
Let's not forget our successes. We increased our popular vote from 4% in 2006 to 7% only two years later. Let's keep working on this, and limit the armchair quarterbacking to relevant suggestions provided to decision makers in the organization. In the meantime, we should be working to improve our local organizations: members, message and money.
As your comments spell it out ???
originally submitted by John Shavluk on 5 October 2009 - 1:32pm.
edited
Yes
As your comments spell it out ???
I see no reason to comment to your views as well but I will say.........
So what?
I have a disclaimer under what I say...maybe have a look again.
I know I would do much much better in certain things .......I have an opinion ....get over your insecurities and allow my opinion...please......you know the one you do not read but some how always have a comment on.
I know it probably was just my comment about some staying sober at national conventions and have to say I did not name you ...remember?
I did not mean anything more than exposing the hypocrisy some project with our cannabis issue and was not talking about individuals ...I care squat what anyone does at a paid for exercise in a political party ...especially on their own dime.
The point is ...and was about hypocrisy.
In this situation I think yes we could be doing much much more and I am no arm chair quarter back and we will see what actually happens now wont we?
But I think we should be throwing our very limited resources at these by elections for more than just a few reasons ...most noteworthy is the chance of no general election for a long time.
I will say that I will still be doing my best in court this January to improve our party and expose the malicious errors and we will still have to get to where I think we need to be to ever win seats.
The fact that I have guts.... drive and some ideas is not a threat to those really involved...only it seems to those who want us irrelevant.....as I see it.
I just wanted to edit this so you did not see me worse than you already must based on your statements but rest assured I am very hopeful for the greens and do have opinions and yes this to me is another mistake.....
Have a swell day.
and oh look...there's my disclaimer.
A bit rough.
Jim, I believe you are being a bit rough on Matt.
I share a concern with Matt that there is plenty of room to grow our abilities. I plead my ignorance in that I don't know what the national staff does, and what we need done. And I know that EDAs need to be independent. But national needs to identify however many key ridings we can afford to make sure they get top notch support all year around and nothing less. We need a full P.R. machine boosting in targeted ridings 24/7/365.
Anyway, my concern, which I voiced above is that Ms. May may become a punching bag next general election if she does not win in SGI now. We should have developed another candidate to be that punching bag. Other parties would never have asked their leader to do this, no matter how tantalizing the prospect.