Steamy gossip: Dufferin-Caledon can win seat in Ontario
Question: After winning our first green seat in Canada, what would be the next best thing to happen to the federal party? Answer: winning a green seat for a provincial party in the upcoming elections.
Winning our first green seat in Canada was a historic break-through. But, it won’t mean much unless we can confirm it was just a first step. It won’t mean much unless winning green seats here and there in every federal and provincial election becomes the new normal.
At 29% in a recent poll (http://t.co/jq7Heni), Dufferin-Caledon is as likely as any constituency to keep the momentum going in Ontario. The obvious reason for our optimism is that we have a great candidate in Rob Strang (www.RobStrang.ca). He’s been involved with the Green Party for over 10 years. He’s been a respected local municipal councillor and local newspaper columnist. He’s a professional engineer running his own business, an experienced green candidate and the male deputy leader for the GPO. The less obvious but equally important reason for our optimism is that we have been making good use of our time in between elections; we have been steadily and quietly building up a green local presence and a winning campaign team machine over the last 10 years.
It was a pleasant surprise for us to get confirmation that we are polling at 29% in Dufferin-Caledon but it was hardly a shock. In the last federal campaign, where we ended up with the only 2nd place GPC finish in Canada, we were polling at 20-25% levels before the orange wave hit. More importantly, because provincial voting patterns in Dufferin-Caledon have always been much less skewed than federal ones, provincially we are much closer to the incumbent Conservatives.
We are working closely with the provincial campaign team and were already working closely with Mike Schreiner even before he became the GPO leader. We are doing our best to ensure that a huge local issue, the Melancthon Mega Quarry, becomes a provincial level election issue. The proposed monster quarry that’s increasingly been raising concerns all over Ontario is in Dufferin-Caledon.
We’ve been steadily increasing our campaign budgets to the point that our last federal campaign was fully funded. However, provincially we don’t benefit from the 60% campaign rebates given to federal parties that break the 10% barrier. Hence, we still need more funds. Please consider making a donation to the GPO or to the local Dufferin-Caledon campaign. Either will equally help to increase our chances of winning a seat in Ontario and either will help our federal party.
- Ard Van Leeuwen's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Blogs are personal opinions, and may not reflect the position of the Green Party of Canada. For official party policy please visit the policy and press release sections.
Recent Comments
- Rick Mitchell | 13-May-2012
- Anne Marie Benoit | 12-May-2012
- Frances Thauberger | 11-May-2012
- Paul Maillet | 09-May-2012
- Steve May | 09-May-2012
- 1 of 2222
- ››





Comments
Focus Fire
Would it be logical for the GPO to use a similar tactic as the GPC. Focus efforts and resources on getting him elected. It will be a foot in the door for the next time around. It will also help show that Greens are making gains across the country at various levels of government.
Different and same strategy
Yes, focussing like the GPC did is the only way to go and that’s what the GPO is doing too. Rather than targeting the leader to win and then choosing a riding and investing in it, I understand that the GPO has instead allowed several ridings to ‘self select’ as those most likely to win. It’s another way to skin a cat. The GPO has only about 1/10th of the funding to work with compared to the GPC so that affects available options too.
If the GPO is successful in electing a first provincial green, it may thus very well not be the GPO leader. There are plusses and minuses to that but one advantage Mike Schreiner sees is that that could mean there could be two relatively visible people sharing the job of first Green MPP and party leader; one to focus more on the present and another to focus more on building the party for the 2015 election.
Ard Van Leeuwen (Dufferin-Caledon, ON)
The views I express on this blog are purely my own and should not be construed to represent the official position of the Green Party of Canada.
Understood.
While I am a member of the GPC ad GPO, I find it to be much more difficult to get info about the GPO. Thank you for sharing that with me.
I wish Rob Strang the best of luck in getting elected.
I volunteered in my riding, but haven't had much contact from the candidate in terms of how I could go about helping around here. Perhaps I'll hear more from him once the campaign officially starts.
Why does the GPO refuse to go
Why does the GPO refuse to go to court like the GPC over the leader's debate exclusion?
Why does the GPO refuse to organize any live protests to *earn* media?
Constantine Kritsonis
Court costs for one
A court battle would use up a big chunk of the GPO's finances or campaign budget so that's certainly one deterrent. There's a very uncertain outcome of course as well because there aren't any laws governing leader's debate participation. There aren't even any guidelines or rules, just vague precedents open to much interpretation and debate. So far it's been hard / impossible to find anyone who will address the matter or say yes or no to GPO inclusion.
I wouldn't characterize this as the GPO 'refusing' to do things that would benefit them. My impression is they are making carefully considered use and tradeoffs of all resources, volunteers and funding available to them.
Ard Van Leeuwen (Dufferin-Caledon, ON)
The views I express on this blog are purely my own and should not be construed to represent the official position of the Green Party of Canada.
GPC lawyer Peter Rosenthal
GPC lawyer Peter Rosenthal already had the arguments to include the GPC leader worked out. He usualy works pro bono - free. I do not believe the GPO considered him.
Re: " So far it's been hard / impossible to find anyone who will address the matter or say yes or no to GPO inclusion".
*Obviously* that's because Mike is barred and they could not care less to talk to us. The decision not to protest is a (weak) style decision not a resource decision.
Constantine Kritsonis