NDP wants to date Greens. No thanks, we're busy.
According to the National Post the NDP has handed the Green Party an opportunity to distinguish and distance ourselves from the NDP, should certain of their proposed resolutions be passed.
One interesting tidbit coming out of the NDP convention in Halifax is a resolution that says the Federal NDP “should initiate discussions with the Green Party of Canada to consider a merger of the two parties”. If the NDP is interested in courting the Green Party they better be prepared for some unrequited love. I suppose it’s flattering in a bizarre kind of way but it’s hard to believe how the NDP could think we would be interested.
Another resolution calls for the NDP to decriminalize marijuana. That’s a pretty safe bet given that the Canadian Senate has already called for legalization of marijuana, not just decriminalization. Ok, so we have something in common.
Were there policy initiatives at the NDP convention on which Greens find themselves at the opposite end of the spectrum? How about NDP resolutions aiming to nationalize the banks and energy industry? How about their resolution to repeal the Clarity Act?
There's overlap between Greens and NDP in the way we look at Social Justice but we couldn't be further apart on the Economy. Dating the NDP just wouldn't work, never mind marrying them.
See the article here: http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2009/08/13/...
- Ard Van Leeuwen's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Blogs are personal opinions, and may not reflect the position of the Green Party of Canada. For official party policy please visit the policy and press release sections.
Recent Comments
- Rick Mitchell | 13-May-2012
- Anne Marie Benoit | 12-May-2012
- Frances Thauberger | 11-May-2012
- Paul Maillet | 09-May-2012
- Steve May | 09-May-2012
- 1 of 2222
- ››





Comments
What's wrong with dating?
I've dated people before with who I find out I have nothing in common with, no chemistry, and we walk away knowing that nothing will work.
A date is not a marriage, it is sitting down and seeing if there is any way to see if there is common ground.
In the past, the NDP leadership, both provincially and federally, refused to return our calls.
I don't think we should slam the door shut with anything. If the Conservatives, Liberals, or the Bloc wanted to sit down and have a meeting, I would welcome it.
However, the Greens are part of a global alliance, have a firm set of values, and reject traditional ideologies. Any arrangement would have to accept OUR VALUES, and be ready to based the platform on principles rather than a politically based "let's attack the carbon tax because we may be able to pull off some rural votes"
I find the NDP to be reactionary and their policy tend to lack clear focus, and their constitution contains references to marxist principles about state ownership of wealth. A lot of NDP supporters thought the Green Party platform in the previous election (federally and provincially) was superior, but did not validate that with their votes.
I have never been an NDP supporter, and joined the Greens because I liked the fact that their was a clear statement of principles, a consistency of policy, and a focus on how do we get to the world that we want by adopting the best practices of other countries. (Also like the decentralized and localism, as opposed to government knows best mentality.)
However, if the NDP wants to modernize then we should talk.
If they want us to roll over, then NFW.
-DG
NDP != Greens.
If I liked the NDP, I would vote for them, seeing as how they are more mainstream.
Since I don't vote NDP, it should come as no surprise that I would not support the Greens if they cozied up with the NDP.
Thanks NDP
Dating is allowed in politics, with any party, but not when it starts off mixed in with the hope or expectation of a future marriage.
What I find interesting in the proposed resolution is that it’s like a good poll result, even though it’s not a traditional poll. It’s flattering to be taken seriously enough for certain NDP members to formally want to consider merger talks when before we were not.
Their proposed resolution means that members of rival party acknowledge in writing that we are valuable, have an influence on Canadian politics and are not expected to go away. We've apparently moved up a notch in the NDP’s eyes even if the resolution does not pass.
Ard Van Leeuwen (Dufferin-Caledon, ON)
The views I express on this blog are purely my own and should not be construed to represent the official position of the Green Party of Canada.
Hear ! Hear ! ARD !!
well said Ard and thank you !!
You are completely correct and as a former ndp (now done party) member I know they have an agenda completely still under the ...LOL...what shall I say..hmm....under the guidance of the labor movement....yes sadly ... even if that means only decriminalizing because ...get this...all those penitentiary workers ...all those social workers...all those police workers and all the thousands and thousands of others involved in ruining the lives of cannabis users and other citizens ...are get this...yes.....ndp dues paying union members !!
They had to back track just because of union pressure... as after all ...as even the police themselves say 70 % of all crime is drug related.....and with crime now going down for 5 years in a row except for murder and likely to continue for sure under only decrim...well no one needs loosing their well paid job just for the weak in society ...the dreaded drug user...of course the ones with jobs are free to continue till their number does come up but until we jail the obese in society as I am sure some would like...well Ard the ndp needs the law the same just for its members....Yes Sir!
No one has more experience with the ndp on this issue than I...period.
They are cowards...hypocrites and are now know to me as the jack layton ndp and will until he is gone and as such completely untrustworthy.
I know for a fact this is only being discussed because of my and my groups work !!
We have them on the ropes and I will use it to strangle them in the next election....
LOL...of course ....I mean ...once I beat back my back stabbers here !!
We don't need the ndp or dp's as they seem to want to change to !!!
(my old man would roll over in his grave if they do change to dp's as he as a Ukrainian worked very very hard to not ever be referred to as a "DP" !!)
They need us
WE DON'T NEED THEM
We will be dating quite a few of their members soon !! ANY WAY DAN !!!
42% did not vote last time....they will be ours
That's 6 % more than Harper now runs the country on and we already have 7%
Who's with me on this?
Trust me...people...as some one attacked even by harpers Internet goons ....over my issue...our most feared policy is in fact ...Cannabis......just watch and wait !
--johnshavluk@gmail.com
"We will be dating quite a
"We will be dating quite a few of their members soon !! ANY WAY DAN !!!"
Are we still talking metaphorically :-)
Wow!
I suspect that the NDP really has no clue as to what the Green Party is all about. The policy overlap is very limited and the "internal culture" of the two parties are polar opposites.
I guess anybody can wily-nily mention "initiating dicussions" regarding a merger but in reality the idea of a Green / Orange merger is dead on the vine.
On occasion I have been approached..
I can recall in my youth walking down Yonge street late at night and being asked, 'Honey, you wanna date?'.
I think this is what the NDP might be thinking, and dating is simply a polite euphemism for what they really have in mind for us ;-)
Very well put !
I agree 100%
My ex partner with in the ndp has just spent the last three days outside the ndp convention
He was barred because he offered financial assistance to like minded people to get to Halifax and help get votes to our cause.
You know just like the unions do ...wholesale ...big time .....and they are actually ordered to vote only certain ways even....what hypocrites the ndp
The ndp... of course ....waited until the day before the convention with this decision to my ex eNDProhibition.ca partner and too late to even stop 6 people with nonrefundable air fare .....hotels etc ..... from going even though they had the info about barring him since last January....that he send them himself...hahaha
its a long story but this was !!!....the only guy stopping 100% of all the rest of my team from totally leaving the ndp.....and he caused me serious grief in my groups with the ndp and the cannabis movement itself...yes...with his lies about staying ndp ...he sure has egg on his face tonight I would believe ......bizarre jacks team can get so stupid .......but I certainly thanked them for just tripling our membership...now !! All over the Internet this weekend!
And ole emery was even part of it as he licked up all the BS this guy put out as they all tried to then stop me from growing the Greens for over a year and a half...its all out there to back up what I say...but this is sweet in some ways.....I am vindicated !!
emery started to come around but still played both sides.....eggs for you too emery !!
Your thoughts though Matthew ....hit the nail on the head totally for my friend in so very many ways it really is sickening......the ndp are now for sure in real trouble and nothing can stop what I see coming
Dan Grice knows all about what I mean with this here ...and I think he knows or gets what I am saying.
This was incredibly stupid on the ndp's part .....and just grows and grows US GREENS !!!
As I said ....get out your date cards ...gentlemen as many many ndp will now be courting you Dan and you others...of course I am jealous and cant really enjoy it like all of you soon will ...yet
I have to finish my battle with the evil queen first .....LOL...yes..before I can rejoin all of you back on the battle field.
Save some for me.
Cheers All
--johnshavluk@gmail.com
Replace John's '....' with
Replace John's '....' with commas and its not nearly as confusing as it looks. Learn to love the comma.
However, his point is probably this.
A lot of people in the cannabis activist movement, which is fairly large, have tried to work within existing parties for years only to find those parties will do anything to stifle debate. At the recent convention, in addition to banning Larsen, the party brass went as far as throwing out a legalizing motion that overwhelmingly passed their motion prioritization meeting. Their motion to discuss modernizing their name didn't even reach the floor, because opponents filibustered an earlier motion on by-laws by reading out loud lengthy sections of the constitution and the moderator refused to put a timeline on the earlier debate.
John is hoping this is the last straw, and that the activists will realize that even if you win support on the ground, the other parties have no respect for participatory democracy.
Now John, you better keep to your promise. We are having a membership contest and the signups are listed here:
http://www.greenparty.ca/membership-drive-contest
As of now, it hasn't increased greatly over the weekend. So you better get on the phone with your friends to make sure they buy their memberships.
Ummm...Dan?
OK.
So I am hard to read? Is that it?
The link does not work Dan....but I get ...yes I get what you are saying.
I used to use comma's and now just the dots ...LOL
I was trained on Morse code.... I am so old...LOL
OK so I will attempt to learn the language of those completely indoctrinated by academia.
To me its like a learning disability some of you must have...LOL.
To any in my group following all should remember Larsen being given his nomination even with out being vetted just because he helped the BC ndp discredit me from further nominations (3 to that point) ...Yes after I stood up and challenged the ndp brass in Quebec City and ran for president of the party just to say the word cannabis.
I had after all just obtained the first grass roots resolution by 83% in Delta North against heavy odds with an average age of 70.
Jack always said...."go get the grass roots support"
While when I did do just that , something others had in fact tried to do since 1972 ,well he did not know what to do except get dirty and they certainly did!
People can read it still as its all still out there but buried now under lies like anti-Semitic links about me.
In fact 5000 posts explaining my whole journey so far( maybe that's why they tried to bury my name?)
Any way I came home from Quebec City and wrote that jack layton was a coward and a hypocrite and mere hours later I had two police departments here threatening myself and my family.
They even gave us occurrence numbers that today people .....DO NOT EVEN EXIST !!
And it was only the quick thinking of my youngest son Jesse who video taped them all and caused them to back down from trying to take me away with no warrant and no real charges.
Any of you know about the "Car 86" stories?
It is a police term where the rumour is that the suspect is given certain drugs by a psych nurse while being video taped and thereby completely silenced over the babble they record!!
Stories of crying and soiled pants ...etc
Sickening stories actually.
All are just too afraid to ever speak up again.
They tried that with me over my layton comments and all of you better believe it is a serious issue to those against us!!
Union loyalty produces some serious abuses people.
Billions of tax dollars are being used to destroy your children's lives and most have absolutely no clue about what really goes on.
It is bigger than all the auto jobs.....bigger than forestry or the fisheries....ITS HUGE the drug business and not only illegal drugs as it seems Canadians generally like to get high.
90% of those in the prohibition industry ...yes industry are UNIONIZED !!
Beer and TV hockey games is not that big a stretch from a joint and a TV hockey game to us.
Drugs are all around...the illegal actually less harmful than the legal but no one gets to hear the real truth because of corruption and greed.
We are spoon fed things to believe.
The never ending stories of huge drug busts and cash forever repeated like a skipping record and no one see's the truth.
Or how about just listening to the 6 o'clock news ...with lots of people then thinking they themselves now have a new disease needing medicine..LOL...
I have said in election speeches..."even though the bikers cut the locks off my gates and broke in wearing masks and gloves and threatened to cut my head off...the police have been far more brutal"
Let that sink in as you think about what Canada is supposed to be.
I MEAN IT !!
I am a military Veteran....a bailiff...an ex Revenue Canada Department Head...an ex banker.
I come from a very conservative back ground and maybe that's why I am successful at organizing our people in this fight and why Yes because of it I have been targeted.
I used to say "what can they possibly do to me as they already took my life in 1991"
Well I sure found out didn't I?
All of you do not realize the battles both my self and wife have already fought back....taxation battles..business licensing battles...lost jobs and loans...I could go on and on trust me.
The whole point here is that yes Dan you are correct we probably just doubled in new members and most of you do not even understand why.
If I told you guys all that I and my family have really been through over this issue half of you would drop it and hide I know.
None of you probably even thought about how hard my heart raced as I looked up and saw 4 masked men with gloves standing in front of my desk and what then Yes transpired.
It is that bad people and as I also have said many many times..."they should have finished killing me in 1991 because I will prove that convicting an innocent man just because he stood up to police bullies who were by their own neglect killing natives in Saskatchewan will prove to be the biggest mistake in the drug war"!!
I mean it and I will not stop nor quit....even if that means the cowards in our own party cause more damage against us!
I wish yes that I could write like some of you guys do so more would understand but I am trying to get better and say again I lived in a 1964 Galaxy 500 behind my high school and only joined Canada's Armed Forces because I was starting to freeze to death at 30 below.
I did not graduate high school but yes now have my GED.
And much much more.
Please over look my weak grammar and please try to see the real message here.
Thank you for reading this.
--
johnshavluk@gmail.com
The link is right, but for
The link is right, but for some reason there is an extra space at the end which is screwing it up.
http://www.greenparty.ca/membership-drive-contest
"..." are okay at the end of a sentence or at the beginning of one, or for putting a quote in when you are only using a partial sentence. They essentially are indicating something has been removed before or after. If you are trying to interject a thought then commas, like this, double dashes --for emphasis -- or (brackets) work nice. However, its much better to put a new idea in its own line and whichever mechanism you use can be self defeating if you overuse it.
I'm not a grammar stickler (routinely mix up my theres and theirs and abuse the comma) and could generally care less for convention, however it is important that you don't have your meaning misconstrued. Frankly, I can't stand a lot of academics who try to make themselves sound intelligent by using obscure words to describe a simple concept.
Perception is often as essential to language than as, and you can set back your causes you support if create a different perception.
Thank you for the info Dan
Submitted by John Shavluk on 17 August 2009 - 1:26am.
I promise to completely shut up once my name is cleared and no more old and young people come to my gate because they were smashed over a plant others lorded over them in blatant insanity.
It is too late for me to pretend to be anything other than just me.
After we win and sanity I hope again has a chance I will never be heard from again.
I promise.
Now lets go sign up all those rejected ndp.
The way I see it the momentum to the next election is only ours to lose.
Cheers
You're a welcome participant
You're a welcome participant and I doubt you would be silent for too long :-)
The reason for the NDP to want to merge
Clearly they wish to talk merger as, at the moment, both us and them are perceived as the places to vote if you are sick of the Liberals/Conservatives (I see them as pretty much the same thing - both want power and will do anything to get it).
What the NDP (and many in general society) miss is that we are unique. We do believe capitalism can be a force for good, it just needs a tax system that encourages that 'good' behaviour rather than a convoluted system that encourages 'bad' behaviour. We need to also have laws that discourage practices that are known to destroy the environment and to enforce those laws (go to Northern Ontario on the dirt roads and you'll quickly see how the forest industry ignores a lot of laws due to poor enforcement).
Many differences, with the main thing in common being that we are both viewed as '3rd choices' right now. Nowhere near enough for a merger.
John Northey
Wellington-Halton Hills
Personally, I like to think
Personally, I like to think our ideological differences go back to the Bakunin (anarchist)/Marx (communist) split in the socialist international in the late 19th century, when the marxist (distrusting people) felt they needed a elite dictatorship of the proletariat to rule and control the means of production, while bakunin (distrusting the authoritarian aspects of marxism) felt that social change could happen independently of government, and that any centralize force would be as bad as that which it was set to replace.
The vision of both men were very similar, a world without oppression and where basic needs were met, but the means were radically different. One advocated armed rebellion and over throw, while the other felt that self organizing and new means of relationships could displace the aristocracy and focussed on bottom up organizing and empowerment.
Marxist legacy ended up leading to stalinism, while bakunin's vision got crushed in the early paris communes and spain with the victory of franco.
Now, these world views are still predominant, even if they have evolved greatly over the last 100 years. (At least on our side, following eco-feminists such as emma goldman, and small scale capitalists such as Schumacher.)
The Merger mentality
The merger mentality is certainly not from the top of the NDP. The upper quarters would surely like to see us disappear, and while hardly homogenous, there is a huge distrust of a decentralized ideology which goes against the notion of "solidarity of the proletariat" and "class warfare" which many old school socialists have spent their life perpetuating. We are much more likely to allow individual freedoms, less government, and individual responsibility provided basic needs are met and we maintain a sustainable economy and don't wreck our environment. (I believe Green values are much more inherently universal, even if self interest rejects them.)
However, I think most NDP supporters and even many of their candidates and some of their elected politicians do not necessarily universally share the old marxist mentality, and many would probably feel much more at home with the Green Party and our value set.
Some, may even see the talk of us combining as a way to reject or rethink some of their outdated principles. (Others may just like our colours, as Orange is so unfashionable :-)
Remember, many voters and average Canadians who support either of our parties are unfamiliar with the nuanced differences and leanings. NDP is associated with social justice, Greens are associated with sustainability, and many social progressives can't understand why we can't find common ground.
In many ways they are aware we are cannibalizing their vote, and more dangerous to them, we are the party that more actively attracts younger Canadians, essentially eroding their young voting base. We pull from the right as well, mainly because we do not carry the marxist baggage as readily and do not as often attack engage in anti-business language.
The problem is, for any consideration to occur, THEY HAVE TO CHANGE. It would have to be under different leadership which did not have the baggage and it would require them realizing that our policy, almost en masse, it superior to there's.
One of our troubles, is that we focus on the ideal and how to get their, rather than who benefits from a certain policy. We don't perpetuate societal divisions for the sake of raising funds or solidifying our base.
ndp wants to date greens
I hope they mean speed dating, where you have a certain amount of time to talk over your beliefs and values and then pick the best date possible. The Green Party believes in consensus and that all parties have SOME valid points, in fact most Canadians believe that, unfortunately for we Canadian citizens the non valid points are winning the day.
I would like to see the Green Party expose those in the mainstream parties who are undermining Government and seem to be going for a coup de'tat installing market based and run Government. The ndp is guilty of keeping thier lips zipped on their 100% involvement in public / private partnerships and the back door implementation of a NorthAmerican Union, which is part of the coup de'tat.
Yes, the current ndp is the date you want to ditch