Harper+Cameron's 'laissez-faire' creates global depression

 At the World Championship ‘hold-em’ poker game called ‘free-trade’, the Transnational Corporations cleaned-out the Western countries who gave them birth and nurtured them.  Shipping jobs off-shore and avoiding paying any taxes.  Governments saw their revenues plunge.  Then moving on to the next level; executives, traders and banksters cleaned-out the banks and institutions that allow the system to operate at all.

But what do you do when you’ve won all the chips and there’s no one left to play with?  They are now in a quandary – where can they put their money?  Gee whiz, there’s no safe investments anymore!  Because they’ve bankrupted the system.  Banks, Governments, counties and the populations that supported them are broke.

Instead of clawing back lost revenue with a wealth tax or international profit taxes, trained mascots for the wealthy, Harper and Cameron have vowed to cut their way out of debt, back to prosperity.  You can’t cut your way to revenues that have fallen off the chart.  Like the thirties, this is only deepening the recession and slowing even more the gasping economy. 

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Dead wrong again...

 

"Prime Minister Harper's prescription for the world economy, calling for more austerity, is precisely the wrong medicine at this time," said *Douglas Porter*, deputy chief economist at BMO Capital Markets, in a weekly note to clients. "The sell-off in stocks and rally in bonds are clearly sending that message."  

The Wall Street Journal, Sept. 23, 2011: 

http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20110923-710821.html

 

Respectfully, D. Scott Barclay

Austerity...

Austerity, being the opposite of stimulus, will of course have a negative effect on stocks (being a short-term indicator.)  It is difficult to determine what's the cause and what's the effect here.  Bond rallies as a result of stock declines is not a harbinger of doom.

I am all for austerity, depending on what we mean by austerity.  If it means cutting corporate welfare and not building bridges to nowhere, that's great.  If it means cuts to education and healthcare, then I'm against it.

Generally speaking, however, chief economists of large Canadian banks publicize their opinions for their own benefit, the benefit of their employing bank, or the bank's institutional clients.  As far as regular Joes are concerned, Douglas Porter's comments are meaningless.  It might be good for you, it might not.  It's not his concern, however.