Proud to be a pirate

I'll admit it: I love pirates.

I have all the Pirates of Caribbean films on DVD. I do a pretty mean Cpt. Jack Sparrow at Halloween - made the costume myself. My house is decorated with cutlasses (real) and figurines of Anne Bonney and Edward Teach (Blackbeard). And it's not just the fantasy pirates of Hollywood. I can reel off a plethora of obscure facts about real-life piracy from ancient days when Julius Caesar was held hostage by pirates through the Golden Age of Pirates in the 1600-1700s when Blackbeard, Bonney, Calico Jack and the rest roamed the Spanish Main. Few people know that the pirate ships and Caribbean pirate colonies were essentially the world's first true egalitarian democracies.

Which brings us to the topic du jour: the pirates of Somalia. I probably don't need to go into the details. You've all seen the headlines. Speedboats packed with Somali men, AK-47s and RPGs, nabbing international shipping off the Horn of Africa with unfettered abandon and making off with massive ransoms while the navies of the world run circles trying to keep up.

Media coverage has been pretty uniform. Pirates Bad. Something Must Be Done. Oh Woe This Shameful Lawlessness. If anybody bothers to talk about background at all, or to question why these pirates are there, it's pretty glossed over and superficial. Somalia is a failed state. There's no law and order. These pirates are just crooks and thugs exploiting the situation. Typically, the mainstream media has not dug deeper to find out who most of these pirates were before they were pirates, and why they really turned to piracy.

Ya see, for the most part, today's Somali pirate was yesterday's Somali coastal fisherman. The coastal areas of the Horn of Africa are rich fishing grounds. Very rich. Rich enough to attract the attention of certain fish-hungry Asian and European markets (Who Shall Remain Nameless) and their massive fleets of mega fish-trawlers. And as Canadians we all know how fast those kinds of fishing fleets can decimate a fish stock. Fast forward a bit to the mid-90s. The Government of Somalia implodes spectacularly. No new government of any real power takes its place. Suddenly there's no authority to monitor the waters off Somalia. So having stripped the waters of fish,  those unnamed European and Asian fleets find a new use for the Somali coast: un-policed toxic waste dumping ground. Pan over to our communities of Somali fishermen. Now not only are the fish stocks upon which they relied all but gone, the few fish that are remaining have become a delightful cornucopia of poisons.

No fish = no food+no income

But what they did have were fast little boats (ironically, some of those boats were given to them by western aid agencies who were trying to help rebuild their fisheries) and, thanks to the political unrest, easy access to a large supply of weapons. And what did they see within spitting distance of their shores but scores of undefended rich tourist yachts, cruise ships and billions of dollars worth of international shipping. So - shock and surprise - they "went on their own account" as they used to say in the 1700s. I don't know about you but I'd hoist the skull-and-bones for lesser cause.

By some reports, some of these Somali pirates actually consider themselves to be an unofficial Somali Coast Guard. In their minds all they're doing is taking what they feel their communities are owed by the rest of the world for the - let's be frank - right royal screwing they've received over the years. Now I've no doubt that not all these pirates are pure Robin Hood types. There very likely are more than a few true thugs and villains in the crew. The thing to bear in mind is that, relative to piracy occuring in other parts of the world right now - eg in other coastal areas of Africa, in Asian waters - the Somali acts of piracy have been relatively civil. Ships are taken and crews held hostage, but in most cases both released unharmed when the ransom is delivered. In other parts of the world the pirates routinely just slaughter everyone on board and take what they want before vanishing. Sometimes both ship and crew just disappear never to be heard from again.

The long and the short of it (and yes, this is turning into a long entry, but this issue really has my long john silvers in a knot) is this: we can fill the waters of Somalia with so many navy ships that you can walk the entire length of the coastline going from ship deck to ship deck without ever touching water. We can let loose the US Marine snipers. We can even start hanging pirates from the yard-arms in traditional Royal Navy fashion. We can do all that. But if we don't give the coastal peoples of Somalia a real alternative for obtaining a livelihood the pirates will just keep coming back. Generation after generation.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Good analysis, but concluding comment is overboard

 

I appreciate your careful analysis of the situation in Somalia, and what’s in part led to that situation. The depletion of fish stock’s off of Africa’s eastern coast is not as well known in Canada as it should be, given our own historic experience. And you’re absolutely right that the western media hasn’t been digging deep enough into this story to present a more balanced view of what is motivating all of this recent piracy. 

Far too many people continue to be shocked that we have pirates at large in the world today, 2009. It’s incomprehensible. So your blogpost here has really helped us all understand better why this is the case, at least with regards to the Horn of Africa. 

But I think you went too far in your enthusiasm for piracy in your last paragraph. While I can understand your sympathy for Somali pirates, dangerous acts of violence in contravention of international laws which put innocent people at risk to injury and death (those sailors on the fat oil tankers) won’t have my endorsement. 

As far as the world doing something about this terrible situation, I agree, action is required. But I’m not holding my breath that it’s going to be action which gets at the systemic nature of the problems you’ve identified. Canada, though, could certainly play a role, if we choose to. But I don’t see that happening under this current government. All the more reason for change.

"Sudbury" Steve May

"Sudbury" Steve May

Everyone says that. We

Everyone says that. We can't endorse acts in contravention of international laws. But who said anything when the fishing trawlers and waste dumpers violated international laws?

In general I'm not in favour of solutions that involve violence. But every once in a rare while the world does need a gun (real or metaphorical) waved in its face before it will get off its keister and deal with a problem. Let's face it, if the Somalis were to stop the piracy right now, what would happen? WOuld the various foreign navies stick around to deal with the illegal fishers and dumpers? Nope. They'd declare "mission accomplished" and go on their merry way and everybody'd forget about Somalia again.

I will grant that last para is perhaps a little over enthusiastic. I spent the morning arguing on a list serve with a bunch of gung-ho US navy types so I'm a little wound up and cranky today. In something of a revolutionary "eat the rich" mood. But to avoid overshadowing the important points being made I will delete that last para.

You don't have to delete it

If you delete a paragraph it removes the context of this whole discussion.  I would only remove something if it was truly offensive.  Blogs provide a way for members to learn about proper public communication.  Just my opinion.

"People of good faith, figuring out where we are, not falling victim, making choices, based on our values, with the best available information."

These views are my own and do not represent the official position of the Green Party of Canada.

"People of good faith, figuring out where we are, not falling victim, making choices, based on our values, with the best available information." These views are my own and do not represent the official position of the Green Party of Canada.

Keep Speaking Out, Please!

Kieran, I see that you've deleted the last paragraph!  That's too bad, and not just for the very good reasons Matthew identified.  While I may not share your opinion, and while I might take a stand against it, I sincerely believe that you have every right to express it, and in fact, I think it helps us all move towards a healthy discussion on this matter.  It's obvious you feel passionate about this, and it's not as if you've come to your conclusions out of thin air - you've taken a lot of time thinking things through.  And I agree with what you've said in your reply post about flouting other international laws and will concede that this circumstance wasn't foremost in my mind when I wrote my post yesterday.  It's evident that I hadn't thought through things as well as you had!

In fact, your excellent post here has made a number of us pay attention to this issue, which perhaps hasn't been in the forefront of our minds.  Thank you for doing so, and I for one look forward to continuing to read your thought-provoking posts.

 

"Sudbury" Steve May

"Sudbury" Steve May

It was not so much a case of

It was not so much a case of self-censorship as a realization that particular paragraph was going to prove a distraction. People were going to focus on it, to the detriment of the more impotant points I was trying to make.

Reminds me of our Maritime

Reminds me of our Maritime rum-running days.

Piracy, a part of our heritage/une partie de notre patrimoine

These views are my own and do not represent the official position of the Green Party of Canada.

OK, just kidding about the title.

But seriously, although piracy is a serious offence(and we should be aware of its roots), there is a past of this in Canada.  In fact the entire song Barrett's Privateers by Canadian music legend Stan Rogers glorifies piracy in the Atlantic Ocean.  As I understand it privateers were "private pirates for hire" that would allow one county to attack another without having to offer one of their own ships and cause an international conflict.  Thankfully in Canada we seem to have left this tradition far enough in the past that we can sing and laught about it.   Unfortunately, piracy still exists in too many places in the world.

Here is an excellent rendition by Stan Rogers:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-PQbdmQRwc

Sincerely,

Matthew Piggott
Kitchener Centre


"People of good faith, figuring out where we are, not falling victim, making choices, based on our values, with the best available information."

"People of good faith, figuring out where we are, not falling victim, making choices, based on our values, with the best available information." These views are my own and do not represent the official position of the Green Party of Canada.

I shouldn't digress from the

I shouldn't digress from the main point but I can't help myself... I enjoy the topic too much...

I have multiple recordings of 'Barrett's Privateers' by various performers, including Stan Rogers.

Privateers were privately-owned ships which were issued a "Letter of Marque and Reprisal" by the government of one or another European power. The letter authorized the ship to attack the naval and merchant vessels belonging to enemy nations of the issuing power. Privateer vessels operated at their own cost but were permitted to keep any spoils from enemy ships taken. It essentially allowed a government to expand its naval power and harass enemy shipping wihtout incurring the same costs as an equivalent formal naval vessel. WHile many nations still use private mercenary forces (ie the 'private security firms' such as Blackwater) there really is no modern equivalent to the privateers or the letters of marque.

Piracy is indeed a piece of Canadian history. In addition to the privateers that operated out of Canadian ports, particularly during the American Revolution and the War of 1812, a number of famous caribbean pirates from the 1500s-1700s used the bays and outports of Newfoundland and Nova Scotia as safe havens to refit, resupply, and hire (or press-gang) new crew.

Piracy does very much exist around the world today. To a degree that many people underestimate. There are coastlines you simply should not come anywhere near if you are sailing a small ship. Unfortunately the practice of piracy today is actually far more brutal than even in the hayday of pirates in the 1600s and 1700s. With a few noteable exceptions most of the pirates of that era were actually not given to wanton cruelty or murder. Today's pirates are frequently considerably more brutal. As I noted in my post, the usual modus operandii its to sneak up and board a ship, slaughter the entire crew right off and dump their bodies overboard, take what they want, then scuttle the ship. SOmetimes the crew doesn't even have time to get a distress call off. They and their ship just vanish, never to be seen again. This is why I specifically pointed out the difference in behaviour of the Somali pirates. They have not been engaging in wanton killing, and there have been very few reports of brutal actions against captured crews.

Pirates and Context

I think this is all about context - what is given and what is missed in the age of information. I

I really enjoyed your post Kieran, and although I agree that the last paragraph was overboard, as Steve so punnily put it, I appreciate the sentiment of frustration.

While I have specfic things to say about the pirate situation, I think they were very well summed up by Johann Hari here in his post "You are being lied to about pirates" (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/johann-hari/you-are-being-lied-to-abo_b_15...

I think we will all find agreement on the points Kieran has brought up, which haven't been conveyed in the media. Others points are that most people in Somalia support the pirates, who consider themselves not pirates (a term from British propaganda campaigns) but as the Somalian Coast Guard, and the context around Somalia as an essentially failed state.

But more broadly, I think there is a problem we face today more than ever - and that is the deterioration of context.

My two biggest interests in life are international relations and history. In university, however, I majored in history without taking any courses in International Relations, which I saved for my masters. The reason - and a focus of a number of my papers - was that without understanding  how a certain situation has come about, either current or historical, we simply cannot understand that situation or its solution. What history teaches us is to look at all sources and consider both. While we shape our answers within a frame that our experiences shape (otherwise known as bias), we are charged with a methodology that requires us to consider context and perspective more broadly.

Today we face more complex, globalized and high-stake conflicts than ever before (I don't say that lightly given my focus on 20th century history). There's also more information being passed about the challenges and conflicts in the world than ever before. The consequence too often has been that context itself has been the victim to the age of information. That leaves the reader with a warped frame of reference, and perhaps even less forgiveable - the peaceful solution to a given conflict more difficult to achieve.